Do You Have A Nice Car?

Please check out this link from Info Wars. This is really starting to get scary. In the UK they are setting up a new campaign where if you see that someone is spreading money on "expensive" items, you can let the police know about it. Gee, it seems like because we are in a recession now, we are all suppose to act like sheep and we are not suppose to flourish and prosper.
Click the title to see the article.
I find it very funny to see old Englishmen holding signs that say Bling on it. It seems so natural. Sphere: Related Content

I Agree With Miss California?

I truly have to step back for a moment on this one but I agree with Miss California with her stance on gay marriage and not because I agree or disagree, because I believe in her 1st amendment right to speak her mind.
The problem here is that she spoke her mind and then received so much flack from the public or at least that is what the media is letting us think! The fact is that the Miss USA contest is getting another dose of publicity and ratings are through the roof for not only The Donald but for NBC, which host the contest as well as the Miss Universe contest.
So she spoke out against gay marriage and she is attacked. This is a bit of a tough stance because 20 years ago, if she said that gay's should have this right she would have been attacked as well but there seems to be more behind this attack that seems to be a trend out in our "free" society. There seems to be a right to free speech but at the same time you are not to offend people hence the "politically correct" speech. This limitation on speech is insane and has to stop.
There is a bill at the Senate bill 126, that is in place to stop offensive material on the Internet and it is really that general. The problem again is the question is what is offensive. Would saying gay marriage is wrong or even that life style, what about the opposite view of global warming, or saying only 4 million Jews died during the Holocaust or saying that the president was wrong for what he and the cabinet are doing. Are these the offensive things?
I am sorry but I do not agree with a lot of things that are said out there but that is part of the 1st amendment, as citizen's of the US we have the right to say what we want and if you don't like it, MOVE!!! Sphere: Related Content

What a Week!

Wow, is it really starting to get crazy out there in the world these days. With the Swine Flu killing all of these people in Mexico, infesting all of these people in the US and now about 20 countries, the WHO now putting us at DEFCOM 5 we are certain to all die soon. At least that is what it seems like. Our leaders telling us that they are not trying to scare us...but! Or using words like pandemic or comparing this to the flu of 1918 which killed 40 million people.
The media, or the NWO's PR fountain, has done a great job of making 20 deaths in Mexico and 1 death of a Mexican child who was visiting family in Texas, in to this circus of fear, that we have missed the fact that the discussions of Al Gore's Cap and Trade Ponzi scheme started on the hill April 24, 2009. Yes, that is right, 1 day after the NWO's use of another false fear, Global Warming or Climate Change (there is great article in Saturdays NY Times about why they changed the name from Global Warming to Climate Change, it was a PR thing because people thought of left wing hippies when they hear the words Global Warming) the explosion of a false fear or false flag pandemic of a flu goes flying around the air waves as a distraction away from what is really going on.
Because man is so horrible and we are increasing the CO2 levels in our atmosphere which is then causing the temperature to rise which apparently will cause our demise or at very least might cause a few Polar Bears to swim a bit more often than they have had to lately, we are going to be taxed by our government more now to use products that are based on CARBON. Actually, companies that produce such things will be allotted a certain amount of carbon emissions and will then be taxed above that allotted amount. That defines the CAP. The trade will be a free market trade of a company's allotted emissions which can be sold to other companies. That defines TRADE. In other words, companies that play along will be given larger amounts of emissions stocks (I am coining that!!!!) to be able to then trade them to smaller companies at a huge amount of money because the smaller companies will not be given enough emissions stocks and will subsequently will go over there level of emissions and will be killed with taxes which will cause them to fail and they will be purchased by these larger companies and over all the consumer will have the cost passed on to them or us. There is an expected $500 billion dollars of additional taxes that we, the people of the US are going to have to pay or $3000 a year per person.
Two more points here, Obama told reporters in Jan 2008 that he was in favor of this cap and trade and that he knew that utilities would sky rocket and did not care.
Second this is that carbon is the basis of life, that is why any animal is referred to as a carbon based life form. Everything we touch, use, eat, play with etc, is carbon based. CO2 levels are irrelevant to Global Warning. How can something that is part and parcel to our way of life be what is causing to the temperature to go up. Did you ever think that the temperature goes up based on how hot the sun is? Isn't that where are temperature comes from? I mean, come on, it is cold in the winter because we are further from the sun and warm in the summer because we are closer to the sun. This is hoax that goes back to England and their Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and her dealing with the Coal Miners strikes in the 1970's.

Sphere: Related Content

She Was Almost President!

Hillary Clinton Compares Margaret Sanger to Thomas Jefferson

Infowars
April 24, 2009

Are we to assume Hillary wants to kill Africans and African-Americans?

In 1939, Clinton’s heroine said:

“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social service backgrounds and with engaging personalities … We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.”

There is a straight line from Sanger and the eugenicists and the Nazis.

“Several prominent families are responsible for funding and promoting eugenics in America, namely the Rockefeller, Carnegie, Harriman, and Osborn families,” writes Daniel Taylor. “Two families, the Rockefellers and the Osborns, are particularly significant. John D. Rockefeller Sr. contributed a large amount of money to build the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in the early 1900’s, which housed the Eugenics Records Office from 1910-1944. Rockefeller influence also spread overseas to Germany, where the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry, and the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Eugenics, Anthropology and Human Heredity resided. Much of the money used to run these facilities came from Rockefeller. These institutes became centers for Nazi eugenics programs during the reign of Adolf Hitler.”

Martin Barillas wrote for Spero News on March 27, 2009:

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is set to receive the highest award given by Planned Parenthood Federation of America — the Margaret Sanger Award, named for the organization’s founder, a noted eugenicist. The award will be presented at a gala event in Houston, Texas this evening. Co-hosting the event will be America Ferreira, the lead on the “Ugly Betty” television show, and PPFA President Cecile Richards.

• A d v e r t i s e m e n t
• 

Margaret Sanger, a former Catholic, founded Planned Parenthood in 1916 and was notable during the eugenics movement that with its pseudo-science influenced state legislature and local jurisdictions to neuter young people deemed racially unfit. Nazi Germany’s racial policies and extermination of Jews and so-called “life not fit for life” were also influenced by the movement and the lead organization – the American Eugenics Society.

Marjorie Dannenfelser, President of the Susan B. Anthony List, a prolife organization spoke about Secretary Clinton and her acceptance of the Sanger Award. Said Dannenfelser, “If Secretary Clinton were fully aware of the eugenicist past of Margaret Sanger, I cannot believe that she would be accepting an award in her name. It is in fact shocking that the award still bear’s Sanger’s name.”

Sanger broadly supported the Eugenics movement, advocating for a superior race that was free of poor, immigrant, and minority citizens. She even spoke at a rally of the Klu Klux Klan. Despite this evidence, Planned Parenthood, the nation’s leading abortion provider, has done little to distance itself from Sanger’s legacy.”

Last year’s controversy involving a Planned Parenthood employee accepting donations earmarked specifically for the abortion of African American children draws attention to an important reality for the nation’s largest abortion provider. Planned Parenthood Federation of America needs to be very careful to steer clear of any appearance of adhering to Sanger’s pro-eugenics philosophy. And this ought to begin by renaming their highest award.”

Some quotes of Margaret Sanger illustrate her attitudes towards race and eugenics,

“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members” (Sanger’s letter to Clarence J. Gamble, 1939, December)

Margaret Sanger referred to immigrants and Catholics as reckless breeders, writing in her book, Pivot of Civilization, “[They're] an unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.” (Sanger, p.187).

“The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it,” Margaret Sanger wrote in her 1920 book Women and the New Race (Sanger, p. 63).

Last year an Idaho Planned Parenthood employee was disciplined for accepting a donation earmarked for the abortion of African Americans. According to a transcript of the call, Autumn Kersey, vice president of development and marketing for Planned Parenthood of Idaho, took a call from an actor saying he wanted his money to be used to eliminate unborn black babies because “the less black kids out there the better.” Kersey responded: “Understandable, understandable. … Excuse my hesitation, this is the first time I’ve had a donor call and make this kind of request, so I’m excited and want to make sure I don’t leave anything out.”

Sphere: Related Content

FBI Spy's On The Tea Party

I am actually going to just cut and paste this article about the FBI and DHS's perpetual fear of terrorist...I mean US citizens that are waving the flag and supporting the Constitution. I really sickens me to see that we are under surveillance by our own government. I can see the argument with one of my friends from high school going in the direction that there are groups out there that need to be watched out for so when a large group of people come together to protest, that DHS and the FBI should be watching these groups. And there is some sense to what he would be saying and it is a very reasonable assumption. The thing is that it is happening all the time. Al Qaeda is a terrorist group that we are suppose to watch out for, right?!? Why is it that we are all being watched? Why all the cameras, why the license plate recognition technology? Why tracking chips in our passports? Don't believe me, if you have a passport from the last 3 years, tear it apartment and you will find the chip? Why are our phones being traced? Why do we have cookies as part of the Internet? Think about it, someone can tell me everything that I have looked at on the Internet for the last 3 weeks. WHY GOD DAMNIT? So they can market to me more correctly?!!!!?????
I remember that my ex-wife was pulled over in Buffalo NY, where we were living, because the cop's car had a camera that read license plates. We had a parking ticket that went unpaid and because of that our registration was suspended. We never got a notice about this. She was pulled over, the car was confiscated. When I got there to pick her up, I reamed out the cop for a 4th amendment violation saying that it was completely illegal for him to just scan the plate for no reason. I had asked him if there was something about her driving that made him suspicious of her being some sort of criminal. He explained that the camera did all the work. I completely jumped down his throat about the fact that this was done in violation of the 4th amendment, there was no justification of search and seizure. He claimed that he just ran the plate of the car. I jumped back and asked him what would normally cause him to run a plate, some sort of suspicious action, right? He agreed. I then asked him if he would drive around and just run plates and he said that that would be a waist of time. Something clicked at the point. We will just say that we went to court and found out that the ticket was written incorrectly and the whole thing was dropped. I later found out that the technology for this was bought with funds from the Department of Homeland Security grant to fight terrorist!! I AM A CITIZEN, NOT A SECOND CLASS SLAVE!!!!!!
Here is the article:
Source: FBI Spied On Tea Party Protesters Nationwide
Paul Joseph WatsonPrison Planet.com
Monday, April 20, 2009
The FBI were spying on Tea Party protesters nationwide during last week’s demonstrations as part of a covert program conducted without the knowledge of local law enforcement, according to a source named as a current FBI agent.
The Northeast Intelligence Network reports that a concerned unnamed FBI agent risked his career in blowing the whistle on the fact that Tea Party protesters were subject to covert surveillance.
The FBI agent allegedly told Doug Haggman, “The Department of Homeland Security Intelligence Assessment that is receiving so much attention is just the tip of the proverbial iceberg, and the true patriotic citizens of this country are on the Titanic. This is what bothers me. But is goes far beyond that assessment. There have been very significant changes made over the last few years that redirect the focus and assets of the intelligence community internally. These changes have greatly accelerated under this administration, and the threats have been redefined to include those who used to be patriots. It’s not only chilling but absolutely insulting to God-fearing Americans.”
The source claims that a single page FBI directive was dispatched from FBI headquarters in Washington DC on March 23 requesting that Special Agents in Charge (SACs) “verify the date, time and location of each TEA Party within their region and supply that information to FBI headquarters in Washington.”
Agents were then instructed to compile information on the organizers of the different protests and also send the information back to FBI headquarters. On April 6, they were subsequently asked to conduct covert surveillance and data collection of the protesters attending the Tea Party demonstrations. Surveillance was to be performed from “discreet fixed or mobile positions” and was to be performed “independently and outside of the purview of local law enforcement,” according to the source.
Although the level of detail collected from each operation is unclear, the information was reportedly submitted to Washington, where, “at the level of the National Security Branch (NSB), this information was to “include the office of the Directorate of Intelligence (DI), and integrated with a restricted access database, one that reportedly is accessible to only two agencies” [of the 14 agencies that comprise the U.S. intelligence community, according to the source.
“The implications to the citizens of the U.S. are ominous. It seems that there is a hostile political agenda coming from Washington that characterizes the supporters of our constitutional freedoms as threats to our domestic security, which is totally absurd. The redirection, the refocusing of domestic threats from al Qaeda cells to ‘flag waving right-wingers’ is something that has gone from a murmur a few years ago to a roar today.”
The notion that the FBI would be conducting covert surveillance and building databases on attendants of the Tea Party protests is thoroughly disturbing if not unsurprising. Indeed, before any major political event the FBI prosecutes aggressive surveillance of political groups to the point of harassment and beyond. Before the 2004 Republican Convention, the FBI initiated a nationwide campaign to track down leaders of protest groups and interrogate them, as “part of a national effort to chill dissent in this country,” according to William Dobbs, the spokesman for United for Peace and Justice.
Not long after 9/11, the FBI returned to tactics that were first made infamous during the days of J. Edgar Hoover, by collecting extensive information on anti-war and other protest groups. To highlight the non-partisan threat of the police state, the FBI is now treating so-called “right-wingers” and conservatives with the same disdain. Basically anyone who seeks to exercise their constitutional rights to peaceably assemble and express free speech is considered a threat and even a potential terrorist, as a recent Homeland Security directive implied.
From 1956 to 1971, the FBI’s COINTELPRO program worked to monitor and disrupt protest movements across America as part of an effort to stifle dissent. FBI Director Hoover ordered FBI agents to “expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize” the activities of these movements and their leaders. The final report of the Church Committee, which was tasked with investigating the legality of the program, concluded that the FBI had performed “unsavory and vicious tactics” in undertaking “secret surveillance of citizens on the basis of their political beliefs, even when those beliefs posed no threat of violence or illegal acts on behalf of a hostile foreign power.”
As we reported last week, The Maryland National Guard was put on alert in anticipation of the nationwide Tea Party protests, while a Homeland Security spokesman refused to deny that protesters would be under surveillance from the DHS.
The Maryland National Guard issued a Force Protection Advisory on April 11 which warned the National Guard to be on alert during the Tea Party protests because Guardsmen and Guard facilities might become “targets of opportunity.” The contact point for the document was listed as the Antiterrorism Program Coordinator.
The advisory was almost exactly the same as a United States Army Reserve Command Force Protection Advisory that was issued last November before the nationwide End the Fed protests, warning that protesters were congregating across the country to demonstrate against the private Federal Reserve.
During an interview on the Roger Hedgecock Show before last week’s demonstrations, Sean Smith, Assistant Secretary of DHS for Public Affairs, refused to deny that Homeland Security officials would be spying on Tea Party protesters when pressed by Hedgecock.
“Is the department sending people to video or record in any way the Tea Parties?” asked Hedgecock during the interview.
“Um, I can’t speak to sort of things that are law enforcement sensitive. Um, so I can’t speak to any current law enforcement operations,” responded Smith.
FBI surveillance of Tea Party protesters highlights the fact that the architecture of the police state, which was massively expanded under George W. Bush, has not been dismantled or relaxed by an Obama administration that promised “change,” and if anything has only grown bigger.
The Obama administration’s announcement that the illegal warrantless surveillance of American citizens, a program initiated under Bush, will continue and in fact intensify under Obama, is another shining example of the fact that - no matter who is in power and no matter the political persuasion of those being watched - all Americans who have the temerity to exercise constitutional rights are considered dangerous and worthy of being targeted by the federal government with surveillance tools supposedly introduced to fight terrorists. Sphere: Related Content