There is a Constitution, Right?

We are going to start here, with the definition of the Second Amendment:
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
Yes, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed! Now we will define the word infringed: "to violate or break."
So the founding fathers set it up so the people had a right to keep and bear arms and this was not to be violated or broken. Now why is this? I am not a historian but I have done some studying about this time period to be able to point this out. We do have to remember that our country started out as colonies and each one of these colonies came together, fought the English Crown and won it's independence. But to do this they need to have an army which took some time to put together. This was done by combining each of the states militia which basically was citizens, with guns, that protected their land. From what I remember, one of the things that pushed the colonies over the edge was the Crown trying to ban guns in which left the people with no personal protection which would increase the level of crime whether it was the British soldiers going after the people of the colonies or simple crime amongst the people.
There was a bill, H.R. 17 that was introduced regarding personal possession of guns. Here is the explanation of the bill, "To protect the right to obtain firearms for security, and to use firearms in defense of self, family, or home, and to provide for the enforcement of such right. "
The bill is there to "protect" the right of obtain firearms? Why? Per the constitution we have the right already to own guns, why would we need to have a bill that protects what we already have?
What I think is going on here since 911 is that what used to be inalienable rights have some how been turned around into privileges. We are so used to being told that we are in danger that this country's government some how switched over to a State of Emergency state of mind. Somehow there is this agreement that we are under constant danger and that the natural rights that we are suppose to have turned in to privileges that someone is allowing us to have.
Lets remember this very important point here, the States run the country per the Bill of Rights.
9th Amendment states, "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."
10th Amendment states, " The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
Our States have the right to push the Federal Government to the side and to reinstate their own constitutions and press the reboot button on the Federal Government. What we need to do is to push our States to look at these points of the Bill of Rights and put this country back to its original status. Sphere: Related Content

Do You Have A Nice Car?

Please check out this link from Info Wars. This is really starting to get scary. In the UK they are setting up a new campaign where if you see that someone is spreading money on "expensive" items, you can let the police know about it. Gee, it seems like because we are in a recession now, we are all suppose to act like sheep and we are not suppose to flourish and prosper.
Click the title to see the article.
I find it very funny to see old Englishmen holding signs that say Bling on it. It seems so natural. Sphere: Related Content

I Agree With Miss California?

I truly have to step back for a moment on this one but I agree with Miss California with her stance on gay marriage and not because I agree or disagree, because I believe in her 1st amendment right to speak her mind.
The problem here is that she spoke her mind and then received so much flack from the public or at least that is what the media is letting us think! The fact is that the Miss USA contest is getting another dose of publicity and ratings are through the roof for not only The Donald but for NBC, which host the contest as well as the Miss Universe contest.
So she spoke out against gay marriage and she is attacked. This is a bit of a tough stance because 20 years ago, if she said that gay's should have this right she would have been attacked as well but there seems to be more behind this attack that seems to be a trend out in our "free" society. There seems to be a right to free speech but at the same time you are not to offend people hence the "politically correct" speech. This limitation on speech is insane and has to stop.
There is a bill at the Senate bill 126, that is in place to stop offensive material on the Internet and it is really that general. The problem again is the question is what is offensive. Would saying gay marriage is wrong or even that life style, what about the opposite view of global warming, or saying only 4 million Jews died during the Holocaust or saying that the president was wrong for what he and the cabinet are doing. Are these the offensive things?
I am sorry but I do not agree with a lot of things that are said out there but that is part of the 1st amendment, as citizen's of the US we have the right to say what we want and if you don't like it, MOVE!!! Sphere: Related Content

What a Week!

Wow, is it really starting to get crazy out there in the world these days. With the Swine Flu killing all of these people in Mexico, infesting all of these people in the US and now about 20 countries, the WHO now putting us at DEFCOM 5 we are certain to all die soon. At least that is what it seems like. Our leaders telling us that they are not trying to scare us...but! Or using words like pandemic or comparing this to the flu of 1918 which killed 40 million people.
The media, or the NWO's PR fountain, has done a great job of making 20 deaths in Mexico and 1 death of a Mexican child who was visiting family in Texas, in to this circus of fear, that we have missed the fact that the discussions of Al Gore's Cap and Trade Ponzi scheme started on the hill April 24, 2009. Yes, that is right, 1 day after the NWO's use of another false fear, Global Warming or Climate Change (there is great article in Saturdays NY Times about why they changed the name from Global Warming to Climate Change, it was a PR thing because people thought of left wing hippies when they hear the words Global Warming) the explosion of a false fear or false flag pandemic of a flu goes flying around the air waves as a distraction away from what is really going on.
Because man is so horrible and we are increasing the CO2 levels in our atmosphere which is then causing the temperature to rise which apparently will cause our demise or at very least might cause a few Polar Bears to swim a bit more often than they have had to lately, we are going to be taxed by our government more now to use products that are based on CARBON. Actually, companies that produce such things will be allotted a certain amount of carbon emissions and will then be taxed above that allotted amount. That defines the CAP. The trade will be a free market trade of a company's allotted emissions which can be sold to other companies. That defines TRADE. In other words, companies that play along will be given larger amounts of emissions stocks (I am coining that!!!!) to be able to then trade them to smaller companies at a huge amount of money because the smaller companies will not be given enough emissions stocks and will subsequently will go over there level of emissions and will be killed with taxes which will cause them to fail and they will be purchased by these larger companies and over all the consumer will have the cost passed on to them or us. There is an expected $500 billion dollars of additional taxes that we, the people of the US are going to have to pay or $3000 a year per person.
Two more points here, Obama told reporters in Jan 2008 that he was in favor of this cap and trade and that he knew that utilities would sky rocket and did not care.
Second this is that carbon is the basis of life, that is why any animal is referred to as a carbon based life form. Everything we touch, use, eat, play with etc, is carbon based. CO2 levels are irrelevant to Global Warning. How can something that is part and parcel to our way of life be what is causing to the temperature to go up. Did you ever think that the temperature goes up based on how hot the sun is? Isn't that where are temperature comes from? I mean, come on, it is cold in the winter because we are further from the sun and warm in the summer because we are closer to the sun. This is hoax that goes back to England and their Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and her dealing with the Coal Miners strikes in the 1970's.

Sphere: Related Content

She Was Almost President!

Hillary Clinton Compares Margaret Sanger to Thomas Jefferson

Infowars
April 24, 2009

Are we to assume Hillary wants to kill Africans and African-Americans?

In 1939, Clinton’s heroine said:

“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social service backgrounds and with engaging personalities … We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.”

There is a straight line from Sanger and the eugenicists and the Nazis.

“Several prominent families are responsible for funding and promoting eugenics in America, namely the Rockefeller, Carnegie, Harriman, and Osborn families,” writes Daniel Taylor. “Two families, the Rockefellers and the Osborns, are particularly significant. John D. Rockefeller Sr. contributed a large amount of money to build the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in the early 1900’s, which housed the Eugenics Records Office from 1910-1944. Rockefeller influence also spread overseas to Germany, where the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry, and the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Eugenics, Anthropology and Human Heredity resided. Much of the money used to run these facilities came from Rockefeller. These institutes became centers for Nazi eugenics programs during the reign of Adolf Hitler.”

Martin Barillas wrote for Spero News on March 27, 2009:

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is set to receive the highest award given by Planned Parenthood Federation of America — the Margaret Sanger Award, named for the organization’s founder, a noted eugenicist. The award will be presented at a gala event in Houston, Texas this evening. Co-hosting the event will be America Ferreira, the lead on the “Ugly Betty” television show, and PPFA President Cecile Richards.

• A d v e r t i s e m e n t
• 

Margaret Sanger, a former Catholic, founded Planned Parenthood in 1916 and was notable during the eugenics movement that with its pseudo-science influenced state legislature and local jurisdictions to neuter young people deemed racially unfit. Nazi Germany’s racial policies and extermination of Jews and so-called “life not fit for life” were also influenced by the movement and the lead organization – the American Eugenics Society.

Marjorie Dannenfelser, President of the Susan B. Anthony List, a prolife organization spoke about Secretary Clinton and her acceptance of the Sanger Award. Said Dannenfelser, “If Secretary Clinton were fully aware of the eugenicist past of Margaret Sanger, I cannot believe that she would be accepting an award in her name. It is in fact shocking that the award still bear’s Sanger’s name.”

Sanger broadly supported the Eugenics movement, advocating for a superior race that was free of poor, immigrant, and minority citizens. She even spoke at a rally of the Klu Klux Klan. Despite this evidence, Planned Parenthood, the nation’s leading abortion provider, has done little to distance itself from Sanger’s legacy.”

Last year’s controversy involving a Planned Parenthood employee accepting donations earmarked specifically for the abortion of African American children draws attention to an important reality for the nation’s largest abortion provider. Planned Parenthood Federation of America needs to be very careful to steer clear of any appearance of adhering to Sanger’s pro-eugenics philosophy. And this ought to begin by renaming their highest award.”

Some quotes of Margaret Sanger illustrate her attitudes towards race and eugenics,

“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members” (Sanger’s letter to Clarence J. Gamble, 1939, December)

Margaret Sanger referred to immigrants and Catholics as reckless breeders, writing in her book, Pivot of Civilization, “[They're] an unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.” (Sanger, p.187).

“The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it,” Margaret Sanger wrote in her 1920 book Women and the New Race (Sanger, p. 63).

Last year an Idaho Planned Parenthood employee was disciplined for accepting a donation earmarked for the abortion of African Americans. According to a transcript of the call, Autumn Kersey, vice president of development and marketing for Planned Parenthood of Idaho, took a call from an actor saying he wanted his money to be used to eliminate unborn black babies because “the less black kids out there the better.” Kersey responded: “Understandable, understandable. … Excuse my hesitation, this is the first time I’ve had a donor call and make this kind of request, so I’m excited and want to make sure I don’t leave anything out.”

Sphere: Related Content